Will Oracle Walk Away from the Sun Deal?
|
While greeted with much fanfare when announced in April, Oracle's (NASDAQ:ORCL) planned acquisition of Sun Microsystems (NASDAQ:JAVA) has seemed to lose much of its shine recently. Indeed, observers, including analyst Rob Enderle, point out that one of the original suitors, IBM, may have become the real beneficiary of the proposed Oracle-Sun deal, as customers waiting in limbo for some sign that their Sun-based infrastructure would be safe have become easy prey for IBM's sales organization. That was evident in Sun's most recent quarterly results when the embattled company announced a year-over-year revenue decline of 31 percent, which Sun blames on both the economic downturn and the "uncertainty associated with our proposed acquisition by Oracle, increased competition and delays in customer purchasing decisions," the company says in its 10K filing. And it led Enderle to write recently: "I think Snorkle [Sun/Oracle] is in deep trouble, but I'm not yet convinced that Oracle will walk away. But the trend is anything but good." Among the bad news: a hold put on the deal by regulators in the European Union who are concerned that the deal may be anticompetitive because Oracle's databases and Sun's MySQL are considered direct competitors in some markets. Toni Sacconaghi of Bernstein Research says he believes that the EU will ultimately approve the deal, but perhaps with a condition involving MySQL. Meanwhile, the delay continues to hurt Sun's business with each passing day. And because of the falloff in business Sun has experienced due to the uncertainty around Sun technologies, Sacconaghi says the deal won't be nearly as accretive to Oracle's revenues as Oracle has been saying. Sacconaghi says Sun's results and run rate call into question Oracle's ability to deliver on the promised $1.5 billion first-year operating profit accretion from the Sun acquisition. He says Bernstein now expects Sun's non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) earnings to be nearly $900 million less than his company modeled when the deal was announced in April. "Assuming no material revenue synergies, our analysis suggests that in order to hit its $1.5 billion accretion target, Oracle may need to reduce Sun's work force by 15,000, which represents over 50 percent of Sun's current headcount and appears implausible," Sacconaghi writes in a brief report. Oracle executives did not adjust any expectations for the Sun acquisition during a conference call with financial analysts Sept. 16 following Oracle's earnings announcement, but did say the company has been working together with Sun on joint product integration and development, which is what is allowed before the acquisition actually goes into effect. Yesterday, Oracle announced total sales of $5.06 billion for its most recent quarter, lower than analysts had expected, and also lower than the $5.33 billion the company reported for the same period a year ago. Oracle reported net income of $1.22 billion, compared with $1.09 billion for the same period a year ago. |
Comments (3)
This is old news and not helpful for the industry.
Posted by Ed | September 18, 2009 10:42 AM
Why would anyone consider anything Enderle says? He is little more than a paid shill, with a large client list. While I have very serious questions about the Oracle-Sun merger, Enderle presented nothing other than what is keepers decided he would say. Enderle is NOT an independent voice about anything related to the computing or technology business. I would like to see some real analysis of the Oracle-Sun merger from truly independent analysts.
Posted by DMR | September 19, 2009 8:21 AM
I know of a much better, easier to use reporting and docgen software than what you can find with Oracle. Check out this blurb I found:
That's why we created Arrow. SharePoint users need powerful reporting, document generation or B.I. systems that SharePoint alone doesn't offer. With Arrow for SharePoint, you have those capabilities.
It's a natural fit. You don't have to wait on IT, because you can design and edit reports in Word, Excel and PowerPoint. You save a big chunk of time in report design, and you can run, schedule and share files easily. (No more bugging the tech group for what you need.)
Our customers are using Arrow in a number of different ways. Some use Arrow for designing, generating and distributing reports such as invoices, inventory tallies, financial statements, insurance policies, customer account summaries, product usage reports, certificates and more. Others use it for doc gen and mail merge – an automated way of producing letters, forms and contacts.
Then there are companies that use Arrow for business intelligence. Companies harvest in-depth data and generate BI reports for internal and external use with reporting, analytics and data mining. And organizations use the Arrow's dashboard features to present their data in an up-to-date visual summary that's easy to grasp.
That's the what. Here's the how.
One of the biggest expenses in the report creation process correlates to the design tool's ease-of-use. There's little learning curve because you design templates in Microsoft Word, Excel or PowerPoint. Our customers have found that creating and revising reports is at least 10 times faster than with other reporting systems.
And you don't need to learn complicated code in order to insert data into your reports and other documents, because wizards and drag-and-drop functionality connect templates to their data sources (SQL databases, XML files, and Excel spreadsheets). You run or schedule reports with the click of a button from within SharePoint, and you can generate documents in a wide array of outputs. To sum it up:
Arrow Report Design
Arrow Data Layout
Arrow Report Generation
You don't have to take my word for it. Check out our SharePoint reporting system for yourself.
Posted by Jessica | September 24, 2009 6:20 PM